🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.